Minggu, 29 September 2013

(SLA) THE NATURE OF LEARNER LANGUAGE

Name    : Safitri Dyah Utami
NIM       : 2201411058
Second Language Acquisition
THE NATURE OF LEARNER LANGUAGE
Ø  Errors and Error Analysis
The advantages of focusing on errors from learner:
1.      They are a conspicuous feature of learner language
2.      It is useful for teachers to know what errors learners make
3.      It is possible that making errors may actually help learners to learn when they self-correct the errors they make.
The steps to analyze learner errors:
1.      Identifying errors: to identify errors we have to compare the sentences learners produce with what seem to be normal or ‘correct’ sentences in the target language. However, we have to distinguish between errors and mistakes. Errors reflect gaps in a learner’s knowledge; they occur because the learner does not know what is correct. Then mistakes reflect occasional lapses in performance; they occur because the learner is unable to perform what he or she knows. The way we can do to distinguish them are by check the consistency of learner performance and ask the learner to try to correct their own deviant utterances.
2.      Describing errors:
The ways to describe and classify errors: (1) to classify errors in grammatical categories. (2) to try to identify general ways in which the learners’ utterances differ from the reconstructed target-language utterances. Classifying errors in these ways can help us to diagnose learners’ learning problems at any one stage of their development and also to plot how changes in error patterns occur over time.
3.      Explaining errors: Learners “create” their own rules that different from the target language. Errors are not only systematic but also universal. For example, there are many learners who found having the past tense error (they substitute the simple form of the verb for the past tense form). Then some errors are common only the learners who share the same mother tongue. Learners try to make the L2 simpler (the omission error and overgeneralization error). For example, in omission the learners leave out the article ‘a’ and ‘the’. Whereas in overgeneralization error, they use eated in place of ‘ate’. Other error is transfer error, where learners actively involved in shaping the ‘grammars’ they are learning.
4.      Errors evaluation: there is a need to evaluate errors. There are two kinds of error: (1) global errors, which violate the overall structure of a sentence (2) Local errors, affect only a single constituent in the sentence

Ø  Developmental Patterns
Examining the developmental pattern learners follow:
1.      The early stages of L2 acquisition: language is learned as a natural, untutored process by investigating what learners do when exposed to the L2 in communicative settings. At the first time, the learners (particularly children) will undergo the silent period. They learn language by listening and reading. There are two characteristics in this period: (1) the kind of formulaic chunks, and (2) proportional simplification (leave words out because learners find it difficult to speak in a full sentence). This reduced speech is similar to the kind of speech children produce when they learn their mother tongue in early stage.
2.      The order of acquisition: the researchers try to identify how accurately each feature is used by learner and they find an accuracy order. They rank the features and they make rules that the accuracy order must be the same as the order of acquisition and learners must follow the nature order of acquisition itself. However, some researcher find that the order of accuracy is according to the learner’s first language so it should not the same as the order of acquisition.
3.      Sequence of acquisition: the acquisition of a particular grammatical structure must be seen as a process involving transitional constructions. For example, the stages of learners acquire past tense form. Acquisition follows a U-shaped course of development that is learners may display a high level of accuracy only to apparent regress later before finally once again performing in accordance with target-language norms.
4.      Some implications: L2 acquisition is systematic and to a large extent, universal, reflecting ways in which internal cognitive mechanisms control acquisition, irrespective of the personal background of learners or the setting in which they learn. the work on developmental patterns is important for another reason. The orders and sequences of acquisition can be altered through formal instruction.

Ø  Variability in Learner Language
Allowance should perhaps be made for some free variation, variability in learner language is systematic. That is, learners use their linguistic sources in predictable ways. The use of spesific grammatical form has been shown to vary according to the linguistic context, the situational context (for example, who learner is addressing), and the psycholinguistic context (for example, whether the learner has an opportunity to plan). Furthermore, variability plays an integrative part in the overall pattern of development, with learners moving through a series of stages that reflect different kinds of variability.
Name  : Safitri Dyah Utami
NIM     : 2201411058

Ø  Questions:

1.      There are three kinds of errors which might be identify, that is, ommision, misinformation, and misordering. Could you give an example the type of misordering error?

2.      Could you suggest another way to distinguish between errors and mistakes?

(SLA) INTRODUCTION: DESCRIBING AND EXPLAINING L2 ACQUISITION

Name    : Safitri Dyah Utami
NIM       : 2201411058
Introduction to Second Language Acquisition

Summary Chapter 1
Introduction: describing and explaining L2 acquisition
Ø  What is ‘second language acquisition'?
In this context ‘second’ can refer to any language that s learned subsequent to the mother tongue. Thus, it can refer to the learning of a third or fourth language.
Ø  What are the goals of SLA?
1.       Description of L2 acquisition
2.       Explanation; identifying the external and internal factors that account for why learners acquire an L2 in the way they do.
·         External factors : the social milieu in which learning takes place. For example, it is one thing to learn a language when you respect and are respected by the native speakers of that language.
Another external factor is the input that the learners receive, that is, the samples of language to which a learner is exposed. For example, the learners get some benefit from the authentic language of native-speakers communication.
·         Internal factors : learners possess cognitive mechanism which enable them to extract more information about the L2 from the input to notice. For example, the plurality in English is conveyed by adding an –s to a noun. Learners possess communication strategies that can help them understand the L2 input. For example, when the learners never know the meaning of “art gallery” before, They may be able to describe it by their own term (for example, ‘picture place’)
It can be concluded that the goals of SLA are to describe how L2 acquisition prceeds and to explain this process and why some learners seem to be better at it than others.
Ø  Two case studies
A case study is a detailed study of a learner’s acquisition of an L2. It is typically longitudinal, involving the collection of samples of the learner’s speech or writing after a period of time, sometimes years.
1.       A case study of an adult learner
Wes was a thirty-three year-old artist from Japan who comes to Hawaii in connection with his work, that he had regular opportunities to use English. Wes, then is an example of ‘naturalistic’ learner (someone who learns the language at the same time as learning to communicate in it). He had little or no knowledge at the beginning of the study of most of the grammatical structures. He was still far short of native speaker accuracy three years later. For example, he continued to omit the –s from plural nouns and the third person singular verbs. Although he did not learn much grammar, he develop in other ways. For example, he use of formulas-fixed expressions such as ‘Hi! How’s it?’, ‘So, what’s new?’. Wes was adept at identifying these fixed phrases and practiced them consciously.
2.       A case study of two child learners
There are two child learners in a classroom context. J was a ten-year-old Portuguese boy and R was an eleven-year-old boy from Pakistan. J was an adventurous and confident learner, willing to communicate in English, even when he had limited resources. While R lacked of confidence, using his native language extensively and relying on his sister to help him communicate in English. The focus of the study was about the ability of child learners to use requests in English.
There are some development which experienced by child learners. Firstly they will use verbless requests or just pointed at something to make hints. After that they learn to use imperative verbs in their requests such as using ‘Give me…’. Sometimes they use ‘Can I have…?’.  In short, the two learners still far from native-like competence at the end of the study.
These case studies show us:
Ø  Methodological issues
Language is such a complex phenomenon that researchers have generally preferred to focus on some spesific aspect rather than on the whole of it. There is a problem in determining whether learners have ‘acquired’ a particular feature. Learners made considerable use of fixedexpressionsor formulas. They may manifest use the feature in a formula without haivng acquired the ability to use it productively. Another problem is in trying to measure whether ‘acquisition’ has taken place concerns learners overuse of linguistic forms.
Ø  Issues in the description of learner language
Both of these studies set out how to describe how learners’ use of an L2 changes over time and what this shows about the nature of their knowledge of the L2. Learners still make errors of different kinds. Wes failed to use grammatical features at all and used others incorrectly. Then J and R failed to use requests in a socially appropriate manner. The most interesting issues raised by these case studies is whether learners acquire the language systematically.
Ø  Issues in the explanation of L2 acquisition

An explanation of L2 acquisition also requires explanation must account for both item learning and system learning and how the two interrelate. The learners follow a particular developmental pattern because their mental faculties are structured in such a way that this is the way they have to learn. Then the acquisition in these learners was incomplete, that is because they simply neededmore time to learn. Perhaps, it is only possible to acquire native-speaker competence if learners start very young.

(AW) References

Name   :Safitri Dyah Utami
NIM    : 2201411058
Academic Writing

REFERENCES
Anthony, Edward. 1974. Approach Method and Technique. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ary, Donald. 1979. Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wordsworth Thomson Learning.
Bangs, C. 1988. The Use of Cartoons in the Learning of a Second Language. Journal of the Australian Modern Language Teachers' Association, 23(3), 10-14.
Brewster, Jean, Gail Ellis, and Denis Girard. 2003. The Primary English Teacher’s Guide. China: Pinguin English
Brown, H. Douglas. 1993. Principle of Languge Learning and Teaching Practice. Hall. Inc.
Brown, H. Douglas. 1994. Teaching by Principle an Interactive an Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Brumfit, C., Moon, J., Tongue,R. (ed.). 1997. Teaching English to Children: From Practice to Principle. Malaysia: Longman.
Brumfit, Christoper and Keith Johnson. 1979. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Cameron, Lynne. 2001. Teaching Language to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conrad, D. J. 1993. Calvin and Hobbes and other icons of Americana.TESOL Journal, 2(3), 34.
Gay, L.R. 1992. Educational Research Competences for Analysis and Application. New York Oxford Singapore Sydney.
Gredler, Margaret E. 1999. Classroom Assessment and Learning. Addison Wesley Longman inc.
Harris, David P. 1979. Testing English as a second language. Bombay: TMH Publishing Company Ltd.
Hornby A. S. 1995. Oxford Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press
Julianti, K,. 2013. Improving Sepaking Achievement Using Whisper Game in Journal Volume I Numb-1 February>2013.p3. 1-66
Koga, A., & Cane, G. 1995. Using humor in the EFL classroom: Some linguistic and psychological implications. The Language Teacher, 19(12), 4-7.
Kossack, S., & Hoffman, E. 1987. Use the news: A picture's worth a thousand words. Comprehension processing via the comics. Journal of Reading, 31(2), 174-176.
Muhtar, Andi. 1995. ELE Journal, Vol. 1 Number 1. July 1995. Why Does Indonesia Need English?. Malang. English Education Dept. IKIP Malang.

Nababan, P.W.J. 1991. The Communicative Approach to Date in TEFL in Journal Volume IV Numb-1 March>.p9. 1-10

(AW) Report Final Project

Name    : Safitri Dyah Utami
NIM       : 2201411058
Academic Writing
Report Final Project :
1.       Identity
·         Title : The Use of English Song by Dido as a Media in Teaching Pronunciation
·         Author : Putri Novita Atfal (2201406519)
·         Year of Graduation : 2010/2011
2.       Research
·         Statement of Problem : How far are the English songs able to improve the senior high school students’ pronunciation?
·         Objectives :
a)      To see the students’ interest in learning pronunciation using English songs,
b)      To find the song affect the mastery of pronunciation to the students, and
c)       To decide whether that songs improve the mastery pronunciation to the student or not.
3.       Heading Chapter II (REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE)
2.1 Review of the Previous Study
2.2 Theoretical Background
2.2.1 Definition of Media
2.2.2 Definition of Song
2.2.3 English Songs
2.2.4 The Advantages of Using in Language Learning
2.2.5 Definition of DIDO
2.2.6 Definition of Pronunciation
2.2.7 Teaching Pronunciation
2.2.8 The Elements of Pronunciation
2.2.9 Vowels
2.2.10 The Characteristic of Senior High School Students
2.3 Framework Analysis
4.       Information about
·         Research Design :
This study is carried in four activities in collecting data. There are Pre-Test, Treatment, Post-Test, and Questionnaire.
a.       Pre-test : the aim is to find out how far the students’ mastery in pronouncing the words under the study provide in the English songs before they are given a treatment. The total words which are given in pre-test are 30 words. They are taken from two songs related to the research that is Thank You and White Flag.
b.      Treatment : the reason of choosing the songs as a treatment is because the song are easy to learn so it is enjoyable enough to the students in learning process. the song will be played in the class two times, they are White Flag and Thank You.
c.       Post-test : this test will be conducted after the treatment are done. The instrument for the post-test is the same with those used in the pre-test so that we can examine whether or not the students’ pronunciation on the difficult words has increased.
d.      Questionnaire : this questionnaire are distributed to investigate whether or not the students are interested in learning English pronunciation to give additional information.
·         Data Analysis :
a.       Analysis of the Pre-test : the first step in the research w as holding a pre-test. The students were asked to read and record one by one list of words given in another class. Then the writer had to score the pre-test for knowing the achievement of the students using some formula. The result of the pre-test mean is 36,76. Then it can be concluded that three students got score more than 50%, a student got score about 50% and 31 students got score less than 50%.
b.      Analysis of the Activities : first, the writer played an English Song “White Flag” ad asked the students to listen carefully. After that, the writer distributed the song’s lyric and asked students to pay attention to some bold words while listening to the songs again. After that, the writer handed out the test to measure the progress of the students’ achievement in order to know whether it was suitable continued to the next treatment or not. The writer finally decided to continue the second treatment used the second song entitled “Thank You” because the average of the treatment was 70. The steps in the second treatment were same as the first treatment. While the result of the second treatment was 72,32.
c.       Analysis of the Post-test : after getting the treatments and the result was enough to do the next activities, the writer decided to do the post-test. The result of the post-test’ mean was 71,24. It means that the result was more than 50 point. Based on the result, there was a student who got a score less than 50 and other students got more than 50. Then the difference of the post-test was 34,48. It means that the students’ pronunciation had increased after getting these treatments. It was concluded that using English songs as a media in teaching pronunciation were effective enough, because the score between pre-test and post-test was significant.
d.      Analysis of the Field Notes : in this study, the analysis of the field notes was done to know and describe the students’ activities during the learning process. They were the students’ participation (the writer observed that all of the students participate very well, not only learned the pronunciation given by her, but they also interested when the writer asked them to sing the songs together), the second is students’ interest and motivation (the writer saw the students were comfortable in the class and enjoy the learning pronunciation using English songs).
e.      Analysis of the questionnaire : the questionnaire was held after all od the activities had done. The result of the questionnaire was 72,29 which prove that the students really enjoy the method so they could make a progress in pronouncing English words.
5.       Summary
·         Conclusions :
The progress of the mean score that is 34,48 shows that using English songs as a media is effective in teaching pronunciation. Beside, the use of English songs in teaching pronunciation has some benefits for the students. They not only learn about how the words pronounced but also masters some English vocabularies. Then the writer find from the field notes which show that the students are interested in learning English pronunciation by using song because it feels more enjoy instead of threatened with the theory.
·         Suggestions :
For the English teachers : they are expected to consider about using new method in teaching English. Teacher has to use something different to attract students’ interest such as using English songs which is related to their own world.
For the students : they are expected to recognize that learning English can be something interesting and enjoying. They can use English songs to improve their English ability.

For the next researchers : they can make this study as they reference to conduct other researches on the same field and able to cover the limitation in this study.